Triple
T16753414
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Commission on Judicial Performance |
E407143
|
entity |
| Predicate | cannotReview |
P9391
|
FINISHED |
| Object | legal or factual errors in judicial decisions |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: legal or factual errors in judicial decisions | Statement: [Commission on Judicial Performance, cannotReview, legal or factual errors in judicial decisions]
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8838ffb088190a0b11149929006bf |
completed | April 10, 2026, 4:58 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e3aa28fd3c8190972e2e69ea7dece0 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 3:58 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:21 a.m.