Triple
T16747166
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | IEEE 802.4 token bus |
E406985
|
entity |
| Predicate | logicalRingManagement |
P124486
|
FINISHED |
| Object | token maintenance |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: token maintenance | Statement: [IEEE 802.4 token bus, logicalRingManagement, token maintenance]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: logicalRingManagement Context triple: [IEEE 802.4 token bus, logicalRingManagement, token maintenance]
-
A.
hasRingConfiguration
Indicates that one entity possesses or exhibits a specific arrangement or pattern of rings in its structure or form.
-
B.
ringType
Indicates the specific kind or category of ring associated with an entity or relationship.
-
C.
ringsPropagate
Indicates that rings or circular structures extend, spread, or transmit their influence from one point or entity to others.
-
D.
ringsBy
Indicates that one entity creates or designs rings that are associated with, produced by, or attributed to another entity.
-
E.
associatedWithRing
Indicates that an entity has a connection or relationship with a specific ring, such as ownership, membership, or involvement.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8838ffb088190a0b11149929006bf |
completed | April 10, 2026, 4:58 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e3aa2311748190a17416de577ad159 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 3:58 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e319c807788190901250ab6e0ca55f |
completed | April 18, 2026, 5:42 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69e326b9e84881909a9166e65bd850d6 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 6:37 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:21 a.m.