Triple

T16732141
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Baby Bells E406617 entity
Predicate createdBy P806 FINISHED
Object United States v. AT&T antitrust case E177030 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: United States v. AT&T antitrust case | Statement: [Baby Bells, createdBy, United States v. AT&T antitrust case]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: United States v. AT&T antitrust case
Context triple: [Baby Bells, createdBy, United States v. AT&T antitrust case]
  • A. United States v. AT&T chosen
    United States v. AT&T was a landmark antitrust lawsuit in which the U.S. government forced the breakup of the Bell System telecommunications monopoly in the early 1980s.
  • B. United States v. American Bell Telephone Company
    United States v. American Bell Telephone Company was a landmark 19th-century antitrust and patent case in which the U.S. government sought to challenge and annul Bell’s telephone patents and corporate dominance.
  • C. MCI v. AT&T
    MCI v. AT&T was a landmark U.S. antitrust lawsuit in the telecommunications industry that challenged AT&T’s monopoly and helped open the long-distance market to competition.
  • D. Bell Telephone Company v. Western Union Telegraph Company
    Bell Telephone Company v. Western Union Telegraph Company was an 1879 legal case in which Western Union conceded Alexander Graham Bell’s telephone patents to the Bell Telephone Company, helping to solidify Bell’s dominance in the early telephone industry.
  • E. AT&T avoided immediate antitrust dissolution
    AT&T avoided immediate antitrust dissolution refers to the outcome of the 1913 Kingsbury Commitment, which allowed AT&T to continue operating as a dominant telecommunications company under agreed regulatory constraints instead of being broken up at that time.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8838f242881908abd8bc138795886 completed April 10, 2026, 4:58 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e39c362bb88190921fab43d76c3ee8 completed April 18, 2026, 2:59 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_6a009d4a94688190aabe56c34e8cc2c3 completed May 10, 2026, 2:59 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:20 a.m.