Triple

T16731738
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Tibetan antelope E406606 entity
Predicate CITESStatus P31440 FINISHED
Object Appendix I LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Appendix I | Statement: [Tibetan antelope, CITESStatus, Appendix I]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: CITESStatus
Context triple: [Tibetan antelope, CITESStatus, Appendix I]
  • A. CITESListing chosen
    Indicates that an entity is included in one of the appendices of the CITES (Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species) regulatory listings, specifying its status and trade restrictions under that framework.
  • B. wildlifeProtectionStatus
    Indicates the level or type of legal or conservation protection currently applied to wildlife.
  • C. conservationStatus
    Indicates the level of risk or protection category assigned to an entity, typically reflecting how threatened it is with extinction or decline.
  • D. stateOfConservation
    Indicates the condition or preservation status of an entity, typically in terms of how intact, degraded, or at risk it is.
  • E. legalStatusOfItems
    Indicates the legal classification or regulatory standing that applies to specified items.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8838f242881908abd8bc138795886 completed April 10, 2026, 4:58 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e39c362bb88190921fab43d76c3ee8 completed April 18, 2026, 2:59 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e319c807788190901250ab6e0ca55f completed April 18, 2026, 5:42 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:20 a.m.