Triple

T16711188
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Howdenshire E406109 entity
Predicate formerJurisdictionType P124317 FINISHED
Object liberty LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: liberty | Statement: [Howdenshire, formerJurisdictionType, liberty]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: formerJurisdictionType
Context triple: [Howdenshire, formerJurisdictionType, liberty]
  • A. hasFormerJurisdictionOver
    Indicates that an entity previously held legal or administrative authority over another entity, but no longer does so.
  • B. typeOfJurisdiction
    Indicates the specific kind or category of legal authority or control that one jurisdiction holds in relation to a given legal or administrative context.
  • C. originatingJurisdiction
    Indicates the jurisdiction (such as a country, state, or legal authority) from which something originally comes or under whose laws it was first established.
  • D. definedJurisdictionOf
    Indicates that one entity formally establishes or specifies the scope, boundaries, or authority of another entity’s jurisdiction.
  • E. canonicalJurisdictionOf
    Indicates that one entity holds official legal or ecclesiastical authority over another entity or domain as its recognized jurisdiction.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8838db21081909589220fd71440a4 completed April 10, 2026, 4:58 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e386523fc08190a13a4232af191992 completed April 18, 2026, 1:25 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e319c379f88190ac0adf812486f598 completed April 18, 2026, 5:42 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69e326b9e84881909a9166e65bd850d6 completed April 18, 2026, 6:37 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:20 a.m.