Triple

T16711168
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Holderness E406108 entity
Predicate hasSeaDefenceStructure P45947 FINISHED
Object groynes at Mappleton LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: groynes at Mappleton | Statement: [Holderness, hasSeaDefenceStructure, groynes at Mappleton]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasSeaDefenceStructure
Context triple: [Holderness, hasSeaDefenceStructure, groynes at Mappleton]
  • A. hasFortifications
    Indicates that one entity possesses or is equipped with defensive structures or fortification works associated with it.
  • B. shareDefenseStructure
    Indicates that two or more entities utilize or are protected by the same defensive structure or system.
  • C. coastalDefense chosen
    Indicates a defensive relationship in which structures, systems, or actions are used to protect a coastline or shore area from threats such as erosion, flooding, or attack.
  • D. isFortificationGatewayOf
    Indicates that a gateway or entrance structure serves as an access point or defensive portal belonging to a specific fortification.
  • E. isFortifiedWith
    Indicates that one entity has been strengthened, enriched, or supplemented by the addition of another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8838db21081909589220fd71440a4 completed April 10, 2026, 4:58 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e386523fc08190a13a4232af191992 completed April 18, 2026, 1:25 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e319c379f88190ac0adf812486f598 completed April 18, 2026, 5:42 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:20 a.m.