Triple
T16692506
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Cygnus |
E405628
|
entity |
| Predicate | containsStar |
P1393
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Zeta Cygni |
E1231363
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Zeta Cygni | Statement: [Cygnus, containsStar, Zeta Cygni]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Zeta Cygni Context triple: [Cygnus, containsStar, Zeta Cygni]
-
A.
Zeta Cygni
chosen
Zeta Cygni is a bright binary star system in the constellation Cygnus, consisting of a yellow giant primary and a white dwarf companion.
-
B.
Zeta Sagittarii
Zeta Sagittarii is a bright multiple star system in the constellation Sagittarius, forming part of the asterism known as the Teapot.
-
C.
Delta Cygni
Delta Cygni is a multiple star system in the constellation Cygnus, notable as one of its brighter stars and a future candidate for the Northern Pole Star due to Earth's axial precession.
-
D.
Zeta Tucanae
Zeta Tucanae is a main-sequence F-type star located in the southern constellation Tucana, visible to the naked eye from dark-sky locations.
-
E.
Gamma Cygni
Gamma Cygni is a bright supergiant star located near the center of the constellation Cygnus, forming part of the Northern Cross asterism.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8838c28748190b3f5967c743940ab |
completed | April 10, 2026, 4:58 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e37eaacb948190954231c9e97a4adf |
completed | April 18, 2026, 12:52 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_6a00cfbe853c8190941d9a20173100fc |
completed | May 10, 2026, 6:34 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:19 a.m.