Triple
T16692373
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Bohr family |
E405626
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasMember |
P10
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Erik Bohr |
E1234776
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Erik Bohr | Statement: [Bohr family, hasMember, Erik Bohr]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Erik Bohr Context triple: [Bohr family, hasMember, Erik Bohr]
-
A.
Erik Bohr
chosen
Erik Bohr is a person who shares the notable surname associated with the famous physicist Niels Bohr.
-
B.
Aage Niels Bohr
Aage Niels Bohr was a Danish physicist and Nobel laureate known for his work on the structure of the atomic nucleus and for continuing the scientific legacy of his father, Niels Bohr.
-
C.
Vilhelm Bohr
Vilhelm Bohr is a Danish physicist and biophysicist known for his research in neurodegenerative diseases and for being part of the prominent Bohr scientific family.
-
D.
Niels Bohr
Niels Bohr was a pioneering Danish physicist whose model of the atom and foundational work in quantum theory profoundly shaped modern physics.
-
E.
Ernest Bohr
Ernest Bohr was a Danish lawyer and Olympic field hockey player, and the son of Nobel Prize–winning physicist Niels Bohr.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8838c28748190b3f5967c743940ab |
completed | April 10, 2026, 4:58 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e37eaacb948190954231c9e97a4adf |
completed | April 18, 2026, 12:52 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_6a00c79657ec8190b1b3500b7a99df0a |
completed | May 10, 2026, 5:59 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:19 a.m.