Triple
T1668755
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | SQLite |
E36073
|
entity |
| Predicate | supportsTransactions |
P29730
|
FINISHED |
| Object | true |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [SQLite, supportsTransactions, true]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: supportsTransactions Context triple: [SQLite, supportsTransactions, true]
-
A.
supportsPeerToPeerTransactions
Indicates that an entity enables or facilitates direct transactions between peers without requiring an intermediary.
-
B.
supportsTransactionIsolationLevel
Indicates that an entity (such as a system, component, or resource) is capable of operating with or honoring a specified transaction isolation level.
-
C.
supportsOperationsIn
Indicates that one entity enables, facilitates, or backs the execution of operations within a specified context, area, or domain of another entity.
-
D.
supportsUse
Indicates that one entity enables, allows, or is compatible with the use or operation of another entity.
-
E.
isSupportedBy
Indicates that an entity is upheld, sustained, or enabled by another entity, which provides necessary assistance, resources, or justification.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a8861286808190939afff3ce8ee31e |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abc0e8d5648190915ff689c7ca42bc |
completed | March 7, 2026, 6:08 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a907d331748190963d4ab1a2741537 |
completed | March 5, 2026, 4:34 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69a9178d84008190a96c1429420fb374 |
completed | March 5, 2026, 5:41 a.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:29 p.m.