Triple

T16686074
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject 2 Enoch E405464 entity
Predicate hasOriginalLanguageHypothesis P108449 FINISHED
Object Greek LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Greek | Statement: [2 Enoch, hasOriginalLanguageHypothesis, Greek]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasOriginalLanguageHypothesis
Context triple: [2 Enoch, hasOriginalLanguageHypothesis, Greek]
  • A. originalLanguageHypothesis chosen
    Indicates a proposed or inferred original language in which a work, text, or expression was first created or formulated.
  • B. languageHypothesis
    Indicates a proposed or inferred relationship concerning the language used, such as a conjecture about which language applies or how language is involved in a given context.
  • C. hasCommonOriginHypothesis
    Indicates that there exists a hypothesis proposing a shared or common origin between the related entities.
  • D. indirectOriginLanguage
    Indicates that something originates from a particular language, not directly but through one or more intermediate languages or sources.
  • E. hasLanguageOfOrigin
    Indicates that one entity has its origin or source in the language specified by another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8838c28748190b3f5967c743940ab completed April 10, 2026, 4:58 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e37ea550c0819085bd36c44237a61a completed April 18, 2026, 12:52 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e319bc73908190a0e38bc926b31f10 completed April 18, 2026, 5:42 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:19 a.m.