Triple
T16685213
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Ignatz Sonnenschein |
E405444
|
entity |
| Predicate | mainThemeAssociated |
P36853
|
FINISHED |
| Object | identity struggle |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: identity struggle | Statement: [Ignatz Sonnenschein, mainThemeAssociated, identity struggle]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: mainThemeAssociated Context triple: [Ignatz Sonnenschein, mainThemeAssociated, identity struggle]
-
A.
primaryThemeAssociation
chosen
Indicates that one entity is the main or central theme associated with another entity.
-
B.
majorThemeAssociation
Indicates that one entity is associated with another as a primary or central theme.
-
C.
primaryThemeOrigin
Indicates that the primary thematic content of something (e.g., a work or discourse) originates from or is derived from a particular source or context.
-
D.
themeFor
Indicates that something serves as the central subject, topic, or focus for another thing (such as an event, work, or activity).
-
E.
centralThemeConnection
Indicates a relationship where one element serves as the primary or unifying theme that conceptually links or organizes the other element(s).
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8838c28748190b3f5967c743940ab |
completed | April 10, 2026, 4:58 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e37ea550c0819085bd36c44237a61a |
completed | April 18, 2026, 12:52 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e319bc73908190a0e38bc926b31f10 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 5:42 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:19 a.m.