Triple
T16680253
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Alabama State Route 119 |
E405319
|
entity |
| Predicate | abbreviation |
P43
|
FINISHED |
| Object | SR 119 |
E843132
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: SR 119 | Statement: [Alabama State Route 119, abbreviation, SR 119]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: SR 119 Context triple: [Alabama State Route 119, abbreviation, SR 119]
-
A.
SR 119
chosen
SR 119 is a state highway in Alabama that serves as a regional connector route through several suburban and rural communities.
-
B.
SR 189
SR 189 is a state highway in eastern Maine that connects the town of Whiting to the coastal community of Lubec near the Canadian border.
-
C.
SR 191
SR 191 is a state highway in Maine that runs through Washington County, connecting coastal and inland communities.
-
D.
SR 111
SR 111 is a state highway in Maine that runs east–west, connecting the city of Biddeford to the town of Alfred and serving as an important regional route in York County.
-
E.
SR 111
SR 111 is a major north–south state highway in Southern California that runs through the Coachella and Imperial Valleys, connecting desert communities and serving as a key regional route.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8838c28748190b3f5967c743940ab |
completed | April 10, 2026, 4:58 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e37d6e74ec81909ea95c3e4b0113ab |
completed | April 18, 2026, 12:47 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_6a009194ad188190aae3371c97abc045 |
completed | May 10, 2026, 2:09 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:19 a.m.