Triple
T16650171
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Leibnizian rationalism |
E404581
|
entity |
| Predicate | groundsEthicsIn |
P101571
|
FINISHED |
| Object | rational understanding of the good |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: rational understanding of the good | Statement: [Leibnizian rationalism, groundsEthicsIn, rational understanding of the good]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: groundsEthicsIn Context triple: [Leibnizian rationalism, groundsEthicsIn, rational understanding of the good]
-
A.
positionOnEthics
Indicates a stance, viewpoint, or opinion that an entity holds regarding ethical principles, issues, or practices.
-
B.
ethicalPrinciples
Indicates a relationship where certain actions, decisions, or agents are governed, guided, or constrained by specified ethical rules, norms, or moral standards.
-
C.
typeOfEthicsLaw
Indicates that a given law pertains specifically to a particular category or type within the broader domain of ethics-related legislation.
-
D.
hasStrongEthics
Indicates that an entity consistently adheres to high moral standards and principles when making decisions or taking actions.
-
E.
hasEthicalIdeal
chosen
Indicates that an entity upholds or is guided by a particular ethical standard, principle, or ideal.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8838a41f08190b0c3f79c47df5078 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 4:58 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e37ad85ec881909dc6a434a363dab1 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 12:36 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e319b1d7f08190b5ecb4a68c636c15 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 5:42 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:18 a.m.