Triple
T16620971
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Chulitna River |
E403824
|
entity |
| Predicate | sourceCharacter |
P115013
|
FINISHED |
| Object | glacial-fed |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: glacial-fed | Statement: [Chulitna River, sourceCharacter, glacial-fed]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: sourceCharacter Context triple: [Chulitna River, sourceCharacter, glacial-fed]
-
A.
sourceCharacterization
chosen
Indicates that one entity describes, explains, or characterizes the origin, provenance, or source of another entity.
-
B.
character2
Indicates that a second character entity is involved in the relationship or context defined by the predicate.
-
C.
character3
Indicates a tertiary or additional character role associated with an entity, typically the third distinct character linked within a given context or work.
-
D.
currentCharacter
Indicates that an entity is the character presently in focus or being actively considered in a given context or sequence.
-
E.
character1
Indicates that the subject is identified as the first or primary character in a narrative or context.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d883897eb481909eaaa088ba9918d9 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 4:58 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e3754d6b4c81908eab5210c386ea15 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 12:13 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e296ad3f148190af09223dc35b155c |
completed | April 17, 2026, 8:23 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:17 a.m.