Triple

T16617513
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Beti-Fang cluster E403731 entity
Predicate closelyRelatedTo P37 FINISHED
Object Bafia languages E982519 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Bafia languages | Statement: [Beti-Fang cluster, closelyRelatedTo, Bafia languages]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Bafia languages
Context triple: [Beti-Fang cluster, closelyRelatedTo, Bafia languages]
  • A. Bafia language chosen
    The Bafia language is a Bantu language spoken primarily by the Bafia people in central Cameroon.
  • B. Thura-Yura languages
    Thura-Yura languages are a group of closely related Australian Aboriginal languages traditionally spoken in parts of South Australia.
  • C. Beti-Fang languages
    Beti-Fang languages are a cluster of closely related Bantu languages spoken primarily in Cameroon, Equatorial Guinea, and Gabon by Beti and Fang peoples.
  • D. Wintuan languages
    Wintuan languages are a small family of Native American languages historically spoken in northern California, often grouped within the proposed Penutian phylum.
  • E. Zanian languages
    Zanian languages are a small group of closely related Kartvelian languages spoken primarily in western Georgia, including Mingrelian and Laz.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d883897eb481909eaaa088ba9918d9 completed April 10, 2026, 4:58 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e3754ac9dc8190965197024594742b completed April 18, 2026, 12:12 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_6a007daef18481908c3628a3466300ce completed May 10, 2026, 12:44 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:17 a.m.