Triple
T16608106
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Phulkian Misl |
E403495
|
entity |
| Predicate | successor |
P78
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Jind princely state |
E1222712
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Jind princely state | Statement: [Phulkian Misl, successor, Jind princely state]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Jind princely state Context triple: [Phulkian Misl, successor, Jind princely state]
-
A.
Pratapgarh State
Pratapgarh State was a princely state in western India, historically ruled by Rajput chiefs and later integrated into the Indian Union after independence.
-
B.
Jhalawar State
Jhalawar State was a princely state in British India, located in the southeastern part of present-day Rajasthan and ruled by Jhala Rajput rulers.
-
C.
Kishangarh State
Kishangarh State was a princely state in colonial India, ruled by Rajput princes and located in the region historically known as Rajputana (now largely in Rajasthan).
-
D.
Jind State
chosen
Jind State was a princely state in northern India, historically ruled by the Sikh Phulkian dynasty and later integrated into the modern Indian state system.
-
E.
Narsinghgarh State
Narsinghgarh State was a former princely state in central India, historically ruled by local royalty under British suzerainty.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d883880d0c81908b5fcd454e767b60 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 4:58 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e36093901881909b85af47f75879a9 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 10:44 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_6a0084b40c288190afda6c7643b61e85 |
completed | May 10, 2026, 1:14 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:17 a.m.