Triple
T16608052
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Nakai Misl |
E403494
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasNotableMember |
P304
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Ran Singh Nakai |
E1239200
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Ran Singh Nakai | Statement: [Nakai Misl, hasNotableMember, Ran Singh Nakai]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Ran Singh Nakai Context triple: [Nakai Misl, hasNotableMember, Ran Singh Nakai]
-
A.
Ran Singh Nakai
chosen
Ran Singh Nakai was an 18th-century Sikh chieftain who ruled the Nakai Misl, one of the prominent Sikh confederacies in the Punjab region.
-
B.
Gyan Singh Nakai
Gyan Singh Nakai was a Sikh chieftain who led the Nakai Misl, one of the prominent Sikh confederacies in 18th-century Punjab.
-
C.
Bhagwan Singh Nakai
Bhagwan Singh Nakai was a prominent Sikh leader who headed the Nakai Misl, one of the principal confederacies of the 18th-century Sikh Misls in Punjab.
-
D.
Man Singh
Man Singh was an Indian noble and close associate of Nana Sahib who played a role in the events of the 1857 Indian Rebellion.
-
E.
Jagmal Singh
Jagmal Singh was a 16th-century Rajput prince of Mewar, known as the disputed successor of Maharana Udai Singh II and for later serving under the Mughal Empire.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d883880d0c81908b5fcd454e767b60 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 4:58 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e36093901881909b85af47f75879a9 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 10:44 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_6a00dbf6507081909f6a49c003f9d6d6 |
completed | May 10, 2026, 7:26 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:17 a.m.