Triple

T16600231
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject National Association of Letter Carriers E403310 entity
Predicate subjectOf P38 FINISHED
Object National Association of Letter Carriers v. United States Postal Service (labor disputes)
National Association of Letter Carriers v. United States Postal Service (labor disputes) is a legal case involving collective bargaining and labor-relations issues between the union representing U.S. letter carriers and the federal postal service.
E1222646 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (4 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: National Association of Letter Carriers v. United States Postal Service (labor disputes) | Statement: [National Association of Letter Carriers, subjectOf, National Association of Letter Carriers v. United States Postal Service (labor disputes)]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: National Association of Letter Carriers v. United States Postal Service (labor disputes)
Context triple: [National Association of Letter Carriers, subjectOf, National Association of Letter Carriers v. United States Postal Service (labor disputes)]
  • A. Civil Service Commission v. National Association of Letter Carriers
    Civil Service Commission v. National Association of Letter Carriers is a 1973 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the constitutionality of the Hatch Act’s restrictions on partisan political activities by federal employees.
  • B. Janus v. AFSCME
    Janus v. AFSCME is a landmark 2018 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held public-sector unions cannot require nonmembers to pay agency fees, significantly weakening union funding and power.
  • C. Hudgens v. NLRB
    Hudgens v. NLRB is a 1976 U.S. Supreme Court decision in which the Burger Court held that the First Amendment does not guarantee union organizers the right to picket on privately owned shopping center property.
  • D. Knox v. Service Employees International Union, Local 1000
    Knox v. Service Employees International Union, Local 1000 is a 2012 U.S. Supreme Court case that limited public-sector unions’ ability to collect special fees from nonmembers without their affirmative consent, strengthening First Amendment protections against compelled political speech.
  • E. Wards Cove Packing Co. v. Atonio
    Wards Cove Packing Co. v. Atonio is a 1989 U.S. Supreme Court case that narrowed the standards for proving employment discrimination under Title VII, prompting Congress to later revise those standards in the Civil Rights Act of 1991.
  • F. None of above. chosen
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NEDg Description generation gpt-5.1
Instruction
Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. 
You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. 
# Instructions
Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. 
Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential.
# Response Format
Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"
Input
Entity: National Association of Letter Carriers v. United States Postal Service (labor disputes)
Triple: [National Association of Letter Carriers, subjectOf, National Association of Letter Carriers v. United States Postal Service (labor disputes)]
Generated description
National Association of Letter Carriers v. United States Postal Service (labor disputes) is a legal case involving collective bargaining and labor-relations issues between the union representing U.S. letter carriers and the federal postal service.
NED2 Entity disambiguation (via description) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: National Association of Letter Carriers v. United States Postal Service (labor disputes)
Target entity description: National Association of Letter Carriers v. United States Postal Service (labor disputes) is a legal case involving collective bargaining and labor-relations issues between the union representing U.S. letter carriers and the federal postal service.
  • A. Civil Service Commission v. National Association of Letter Carriers
    Civil Service Commission v. National Association of Letter Carriers is a 1973 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the constitutionality of the Hatch Act’s restrictions on partisan political activities by federal employees.
  • B. Janus v. AFSCME
    Janus v. AFSCME is a landmark 2018 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held public-sector unions cannot require nonmembers to pay agency fees, significantly weakening union funding and power.
  • C. Hudgens v. NLRB
    Hudgens v. NLRB is a 1976 U.S. Supreme Court decision in which the Burger Court held that the First Amendment does not guarantee union organizers the right to picket on privately owned shopping center property.
  • D. Knox v. Service Employees International Union, Local 1000
    Knox v. Service Employees International Union, Local 1000 is a 2012 U.S. Supreme Court case that limited public-sector unions’ ability to collect special fees from nonmembers without their affirmative consent, strengthening First Amendment protections against compelled political speech.
  • E. Wards Cove Packing Co. v. Atonio
    Wards Cove Packing Co. v. Atonio is a 1989 U.S. Supreme Court case that narrowed the standards for proving employment discrimination under Title VII, prompting Congress to later revise those standards in the Civil Rights Act of 1991.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (5 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d883880d0c81908b5fcd454e767b60 completed April 10, 2026, 4:58 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e35d75772c8190b02aef02ea6788e1 completed April 18, 2026, 10:31 a.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_6a0075a48c088190b6585e42dcd73705 completed May 10, 2026, 12:10 p.m.
NEDg Description generation batch_6a0076468d588190972639d0a22f0e3e completed May 10, 2026, 12:12 p.m.
NED2 Entity disambiguation (via description) batch_6a007728680c819082a3bd7e84edb2b0 completed May 10, 2026, 12:16 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:16 a.m.