Triple
T16600084
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Mitchum v. Foster, 407 U.S. 225 (1972) |
E403307
|
entity |
| Predicate | Anti-InjunctionActCitation |
P4420
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 28 U.S.C. § 2283 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 28 U.S.C. § 2283 | Statement: [Mitchum v. Foster, 407 U.S. 225 (1972), Anti-InjunctionActCitation, 28 U.S.C. § 2283]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: Anti-InjunctionActCitation Context triple: [Mitchum v. Foster, 407 U.S. 225 (1972), Anti-InjunctionActCitation, 28 U.S.C. § 2283]
-
A.
legalCitation
chosen
Indicates that one legal document, case, or authority formally references or cites another as a source of legal support or precedent.
-
B.
legalCitationForm
Indicates the standardized way in which a legal authority (such as a case, statute, or regulation) should be cited in legal documents.
-
C.
formerLegalCitation
Indicates that one legal citation previously referred to or governed a matter but has since been replaced, superseded, or is no longer the current controlling citation.
-
D.
judiciaryAct
Indicates that an entity is involved in, established by, or otherwise directly related to a specific judiciary act or piece of judicial legislation.
-
E.
constitutionalCitation
Indicates a relationship where one entity cites, references, or is grounded in a specific provision or article of a constitution.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d883880d0c81908b5fcd454e767b60 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 4:58 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e35d75772c8190b02aef02ea6788e1 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 10:31 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e296aabc508190b3836a91b49113ad |
completed | April 17, 2026, 8:23 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:16 a.m.