Triple
T16600079
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Mitchum v. Foster, 407 U.S. 225 (1972) |
E403307
|
entity |
| Predicate | fullCaseName |
P3131
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Mitchum v. Foster |
E403307
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Mitchum v. Foster | Statement: [Mitchum v. Foster, 407 U.S. 225 (1972), fullCaseName, Mitchum v. Foster]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Mitchum v. Foster Context triple: [Mitchum v. Foster, 407 U.S. 225 (1972), fullCaseName, Mitchum v. Foster]
-
A.
Mitchum v. Foster, 407 U.S. 225 (1972)
chosen
Mitchum v. Foster, 407 U.S. 225 (1972), is a U.S. Supreme Court decision holding that 42 U.S.C. § 1983 falls within the “expressly authorized” exception to the Anti-Injunction Act, thereby allowing federal courts in some circumstances to enjoin pending state court proceedings.
-
B.
Frank v. Mangum
Frank v. Mangum is a 1915 U.S. Supreme Court decision addressing whether mob-dominated criminal trials violate due process under the Fourteenth Amendment.
-
C.
Foster v. Love
Foster v. Love is a 1997 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down Louisiana’s open primary system for federal elections as preempted by federal law requiring a uniform federal Election Day.
-
D.
Cummings v. Missouri
Cummings v. Missouri was an 1867 U.S. Supreme Court decision that struck down post–Civil War loyalty oath requirements as unconstitutional bills of attainder and ex post facto laws.
-
E.
Marsh v. Chambers
Marsh v. Chambers is a 1983 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the constitutionality of legislative prayer, finding that opening legislative sessions with a state-funded chaplain’s invocation did not violate the Establishment Clause.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d883880d0c81908b5fcd454e767b60 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 4:58 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e35d75772c8190b02aef02ea6788e1 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 10:31 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_6a0075a48c088190b6585e42dcd73705 |
completed | May 10, 2026, 12:10 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:16 a.m.