Triple

T16600037
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Heck v. Humphrey E403305 entity
Predicate citationStyle P4468 FINISHED
Object Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994) E403305 NE FINISHED

Named-entity recognition

Before disambiguation, gpt-5-mini classified whether the object phrase is a named entity — the step behind the object's NE type shown above.

Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994) | Statement: [Heck v. Humphrey, citationStyle, Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994)]

Disambiguation candidates (1 decision)

The exact options the model was shown at each disambiguation step, with the option it chose highlighted — the evidence behind this triple's disambiguated ids.

NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994)
Context triple: [Heck v. Humphrey, citationStyle, Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994)]
  • A. Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994) chosen
    Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994), is a U.S. Supreme Court decision that limits when prisoners can seek damages under § 1983 by holding that such claims are barred if success would necessarily imply the invalidity of an outstanding criminal conviction or sentence unless that conviction has been overturned.
  • B. Humphrey’s Executor v. United States
    Humphrey’s Executor v. United States is a 1935 U.S. Supreme Court case that limited the president’s power to remove officials of independent regulatory agencies, reinforcing their insulation from direct executive control.
  • C. South Dakota v. Dole
    South Dakota v. Dole is a 1987 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld Congress’s power to condition federal highway funds on states adopting a minimum drinking age of 21, helping define the scope of the federal spending power.
  • D. Katzenbach v. Morgan
    Katzenbach v. Morgan is a 1966 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld Congress’s power under the Fourteenth Amendment to prohibit certain state voting restrictions, reinforcing federal authority to protect voting rights.
  • E. Heien v. North Carolina
    Heien v. North Carolina is a 2014 U.S. Supreme Court case that held a police officer’s reasonable mistake of law can still provide the reasonable suspicion necessary to justify a traffic stop under the Fourth Amendment.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

Stage Batch ID Job type Status
creating batch_69d883880d0c81908b5fcd454e767b60 elicitation completed
NER batch_69e35d75772c8190b02aef02ea6788e1 ner completed
NED1 batch_6a0075a48c088190b6585e42dcd73705 ned_source_triple completed
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:16 a.m.