Triple

T16599985
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject West v. Atkins, 487 U.S. 42 (1988) E403304 entity
Predicate officialCitationFormat P53709 FINISHED
Object West v. Atkins, 487 U.S. 42 (1988) E403304 NE FINISHED

Disambiguation candidates (2 decisions)

The exact options the model was shown at each disambiguation step, with the option it chose highlighted — the evidence behind this triple's disambiguated ids.

NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: West v. Atkins, 487 U.S. 42 (1988)
Context triple: [West v. Atkins, 487 U.S. 42 (1988), officialCitationFormat, West v. Atkins, 487 U.S. 42 (1988)]
  • A. West v. Atkins, 487 U.S. 42 (1988) chosen
    West v. Atkins, 487 U.S. 42 (1988), is a U.S. Supreme Court decision holding that a private physician under contract to provide medical services to state prisoners acts under color of state law for purposes of liability under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
  • B. Atkins v. Virginia
    Atkins v. Virginia is a 2002 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held executing individuals with intellectual disabilities violates the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment.
  • C. Lockett v. Ohio
    Lockett v. Ohio is a 1978 U.S. Supreme Court decision that significantly expanded the range of mitigating factors a sentencer must be allowed to consider before imposing the death penalty.
  • D. opinion in Atkins v. Virginia
    The opinion in Atkins v. Virginia is a landmark 2002 U.S. Supreme Court decision, authored by Justice John Paul Stevens, that held executing individuals with intellectual disabilities violates the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment.
  • E. Rochin v. California
    Rochin v. California is a 1952 U.S. Supreme Court case that held evidence obtained by methods that "shock the conscience," such as forcibly pumping a suspect’s stomach, violates the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: officialCitationFormat
Context triple: [West v. Atkins, 487 U.S. 42 (1988), officialCitationFormat, West v. Atkins, 487 U.S. 42 (1988)]
  • A. legalCitationForm chosen
    Indicates the standardized way in which a legal authority (such as a case, statute, or regulation) should be cited in legal documents.
  • B. originalCitationForm
    Indicates the relationship where one form of a cited work is the initial or primary version from which other citation forms or variants are derived.
  • C. citationFormatIncludes
    Indicates that a particular citation format specification contains or incorporates a given element, rule, or component as part of its structure.
  • D. formerLegalCitation
    Indicates that one legal citation previously referred to or governed a matter but has since been replaced, superseded, or is no longer the current controlling citation.
  • E. usesCitationFormat
    Indicates that one entity applies or follows a specific citation or referencing format defined by another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (4 batches)

Stage Batch ID Job type Status
creating batch_69d883880d0c81908b5fcd454e767b60 elicitation completed
NER batch_69e35d75772c8190b02aef02ea6788e1 ner completed
NED1 batch_6a0075a48c088190b6585e42dcd73705 ned_source_triple completed
PD batch_69e296aabc508190b3836a91b49113ad pd completed
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:16 a.m.