Triple

T16599901
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Harlow v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 800 (1982) E403303 entity
Predicate fullCaseName P3131 FINISHED
Object Harlow et al. v. Fitzgerald E403303 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Harlow et al. v. Fitzgerald | Statement: [Harlow v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 800 (1982), fullCaseName, Harlow et al. v. Fitzgerald]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Harlow et al. v. Fitzgerald
Context triple: [Harlow v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 800 (1982), fullCaseName, Harlow et al. v. Fitzgerald]
  • A. Harlow v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 800 (1982) chosen
    Harlow v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 800 (1982), is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision that redefined qualified immunity by holding that government officials are shielded from civil liability so long as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights.
  • B. Fitzgerald v. Hampton
    Fitzgerald v. Hampton is a U.S. federal court case involving civil service employment and administrative law issues that is related to the later Supreme Court decision in Nixon v. Fitzgerald.
  • C. Lucas v. Earl
    Lucas v. Earl is a landmark 1930 U.S. Supreme Court tax law case that established the principle that income is taxed to the person who earns it, regardless of contractual arrangements to split or assign that income.
  • D. Hurd v. Hodge
    Hurd v. Hodge is a 1948 U.S. Supreme Court case that held racially restrictive covenants in property deeds could not be judicially enforced in the District of Columbia because such enforcement would violate the Fifth Amendment’s Due Process Clause.
  • E. Shaw v. Hunt
    Shaw v. Hunt is a 1996 U.S. Supreme Court case that further developed the Court’s racial gerrymandering jurisprudence by applying and extending the principles first articulated in Shaw v. Reno.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d883880d0c81908b5fcd454e767b60 completed April 10, 2026, 4:58 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e35d75772c8190b02aef02ea6788e1 completed April 18, 2026, 10:31 a.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_6a0075a226788190bfad73ffb6b32ec4 completed May 10, 2026, 12:10 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:16 a.m.