Triple

T16599850
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Monell v. Department of Social Services, 436 U.S. 658 (1978) E403302 entity
Predicate fullCaseName P3131 FINISHED
Object Monell et al. v. Department of Social Services of the City of New York et al. E403302 NE FINISHED

Disambiguation candidates (1 decision)

The exact options the model was shown at each disambiguation step, with the option it chose highlighted — the evidence behind this triple's disambiguated ids.

NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Monell et al. v. Department of Social Services of the City of New York et al.
Context triple: [Monell v. Department of Social Services, 436 U.S. 658 (1978), fullCaseName, Monell et al. v. Department of Social Services of the City of New York et al.]
  • A. Monell v. Department of Social Services, 436 U.S. 658 (1978) chosen
    Monell v. Department of Social Services, 436 U.S. 658 (1978), is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision that established when local governments can be sued as “persons” for constitutional violations under federal civil rights law.
  • B. McDonald v. City of Chicago
    McDonald v. City of Chicago is a 2010 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held the Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms applies to state and local governments through the Fourteenth Amendment.
  • C. McDonald v. Smith
    McDonald v. Smith is a 1985 U.S. Supreme Court case that held the First Amendment’s Petition Clause does not grant absolute immunity from libel suits for statements made in petitions to government officials.
  • D. Munn v. Illinois
    Munn v. Illinois is an 1877 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld state regulation of private industries affecting the public interest, marking a key moment in the development of government regulatory power.
  • E. Feiner v. New York
    Feiner v. New York is a 1951 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld a disorderly conduct conviction for a street-corner speaker, marking a significant limitation on free speech rights when authorities claim a need to prevent public disorder.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

Stage Batch ID Job type Status
creating batch_69d883880d0c81908b5fcd454e767b60 elicitation completed
NER batch_69e35d75772c8190b02aef02ea6788e1 ner completed
NED1 batch_6a0075a226788190bfad73ffb6b32ec4 ned_source_triple completed
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:16 a.m.