Triple
T16599850
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Monell v. Department of Social Services, 436 U.S. 658 (1978) |
E403302
|
entity |
| Predicate | fullCaseName |
P3131
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Monell et al. v. Department of Social Services of the City of New York et al. |
E403302
|
NE FINISHED |
Disambiguation candidates (1 decision)
The exact options the model was shown at each disambiguation step, with the option it chose highlighted — the evidence behind this triple's disambiguated ids.
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Monell et al. v. Department of Social Services of the City of New York et al. Context triple: [Monell v. Department of Social Services, 436 U.S. 658 (1978), fullCaseName, Monell et al. v. Department of Social Services of the City of New York et al.]
-
A.
Monell v. Department of Social Services, 436 U.S. 658 (1978)
chosen
Monell v. Department of Social Services, 436 U.S. 658 (1978), is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision that established when local governments can be sued as “persons” for constitutional violations under federal civil rights law.
-
B.
McDonald v. City of Chicago
McDonald v. City of Chicago is a 2010 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held the Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms applies to state and local governments through the Fourteenth Amendment.
-
C.
McDonald v. Smith
McDonald v. Smith is a 1985 U.S. Supreme Court case that held the First Amendment’s Petition Clause does not grant absolute immunity from libel suits for statements made in petitions to government officials.
-
D.
Munn v. Illinois
Munn v. Illinois is an 1877 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld state regulation of private industries affecting the public interest, marking a key moment in the development of government regulatory power.
-
E.
Feiner v. New York
Feiner v. New York is a 1951 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld a disorderly conduct conviction for a street-corner speaker, marking a significant limitation on free speech rights when authorities claim a need to prevent public disorder.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
| Stage | Batch ID | Job type | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| creating | batch_69d883880d0c81908b5fcd454e767b60 |
elicitation | completed |
| NER | batch_69e35d75772c8190b02aef02ea6788e1 |
ner | completed |
| NED1 | batch_6a0075a226788190bfad73ffb6b32ec4 |
ned_source_triple | completed |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:16 a.m.