Triple

T16599683
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Board of Trustees of the University of Alabama v. Garrett E403298 entity
Predicate precedentReliedOn P3138 FINISHED
Object City of Boerne v. Flores E39104 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: City of Boerne v. Flores | Statement: [Board of Trustees of the University of Alabama v. Garrett, precedentReliedOn, City of Boerne v. Flores]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: City of Boerne v. Flores
Context triple: [Board of Trustees of the University of Alabama v. Garrett, precedentReliedOn, City of Boerne v. Flores]
  • A. City of Boerne v. Flores chosen
    City of Boerne v. Flores is a 1997 U.S. Supreme Court case that curtailed Congress’s power under the Fourteenth Amendment and held that the Religious Freedom Restoration Act could not be applied to the states.
  • B. Van Orden v. Perry
    Van Orden v. Perry is a 2005 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the constitutionality of a Ten Commandments monument on Texas State Capitol grounds against an Establishment Clause challenge.
  • C. League of United Latin American Citizens v. Perry
    League of United Latin American Citizens v. Perry is a 2006 U.S. Supreme Court case that examined the constitutionality of Texas’s congressional redistricting plan, particularly its implications for Latino voting rights and partisan gerrymandering.
  • D. Eisenstadt v. Baird
    Eisenstadt v. Baird is a landmark 1972 U.S. Supreme Court decision that extended the right to possess and use contraceptives to unmarried individuals, significantly advancing privacy and equal protection jurisprudence.
  • E. Garcetti v. Ceballos
    Garcetti v. Ceballos is a 2006 U.S. Supreme Court decision holding that public employees do not have First Amendment protection for speech made pursuant to their official job duties.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d883880d0c81908b5fcd454e767b60 completed April 10, 2026, 4:58 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e35d75772c8190b02aef02ea6788e1 completed April 18, 2026, 10:31 a.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_6a007da8c5048190aaa9350f8fcc8a2e completed May 10, 2026, 12:44 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:16 a.m.