Triple
T16599023
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | The Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act’s provisions prohibiting state authorization of sports gambling schemes violate the anti-commandeering rule of the Tenth Amendment |
E403283
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | United States Supreme Court holding |
C35669
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: United States Supreme Court holding Context triple: [The Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act’s provisions prohibiting state authorization of sports gambling schemes violate the anti-commandeering rule of the Tenth Amendment, instanceOf, United States Supreme Court holding]
-
A.
judicial holding
chosen
A judicial holding is the court’s essential legal determination on the specific issues necessary to resolve a case, which forms binding precedent for future similar disputes.
-
B.
United States Supreme Court case
A United States Supreme Court case is a legal dispute brought before the highest federal court in the U.S., resulting in a binding decision that interprets the Constitution, federal laws, or treaties and sets nationwide precedent.
-
C.
Insular Cases decision
An Insular Cases decision is a U.S. Supreme Court ruling from the early 20th century that determined how the Constitution applies to territories acquired by the United States, distinguishing between "incorporated" and "unincorporated" territories.
-
D.
supreme court
The Supreme Court is the highest judicial authority in a legal system, responsible for interpreting the constitution, resolving significant legal disputes, and setting binding precedents for lower courts.
-
E.
court decision
A court decision is a formal, authoritative ruling issued by a judicial body that resolves the legal issues in a case and may establish or apply legal precedent.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d883880d0c81908b5fcd454e767b60 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 4:58 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:16 a.m.