Triple

T16586400
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Rules Enabling Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2071–2077 E402967 entity
Predicate interpretedIn P2252 FINISHED
Object Hanna v. Plumer, 380 U.S. 460 (1965) E354848 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Hanna v. Plumer, 380 U.S. 460 (1965) | Statement: [Rules Enabling Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2071–2077, interpretedIn, Hanna v. Plumer, 380 U.S. 460 (1965)]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Hanna v. Plumer, 380 U.S. 460 (1965)
Context triple: [Rules Enabling Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2071–2077, interpretedIn, Hanna v. Plumer, 380 U.S. 460 (1965)]
  • A. Hanna v. Plumer chosen
    Hanna v. Plumer is a 1965 U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified the application of the Erie doctrine by holding that valid Federal Rules of Civil Procedure govern over conflicting state procedural laws in federal diversity actions.
  • B. Hudson v. Palmer
    Hudson v. Palmer is a 1984 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held prisoners have no reasonable expectation of privacy in their cells under the Fourth Amendment.
  • C. Katzenbach v. Morgan
    Katzenbach v. Morgan is a 1966 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld Congress’s power under the Fourteenth Amendment to prohibit certain state voting restrictions, reinforcing federal authority to protect voting rights.
  • D. Katzenbach v. McClung
    Katzenbach v. McClung is a 1964 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the federal government’s power to prohibit racial discrimination in local restaurants under the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
  • E. Regan v. Wald
    Regan v. Wald is a 1984 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld federal restrictions on travel to Cuba, affirming broad executive authority over foreign affairs and economic sanctions.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d88387363c8190a97a0c942130de97 completed April 10, 2026, 4:58 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e3599cbc448190bc80eef4ad58eb41 completed April 18, 2026, 10:14 a.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_6a006ef4f17c819095b3c6f8644b687b completed May 10, 2026, 11:41 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:16 a.m.