Triple

T16586399
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Rules Enabling Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2071–2077 E402967 entity
Predicate interpretedIn P2252 FINISHED
Object Sibbach v. Wilson & Co., 312 U.S. 1 (1941) E354847 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Sibbach v. Wilson & Co., 312 U.S. 1 (1941) | Statement: [Rules Enabling Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2071–2077, interpretedIn, Sibbach v. Wilson & Co., 312 U.S. 1 (1941)]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Sibbach v. Wilson & Co., 312 U.S. 1 (1941)
Context triple: [Rules Enabling Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2071–2077, interpretedIn, Sibbach v. Wilson & Co., 312 U.S. 1 (1941)]
  • A. Sibbach v. Wilson & Co. chosen
    Sibbach v. Wilson & Co. is a 1941 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the validity of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure under the Rules Enabling Act and helped define the scope of federal procedural rulemaking.
  • B. Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer
    Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer is a landmark 1952 U.S. Supreme Court case that limited presidential power by ruling that President Truman lacked authority to seize steel mills during the Korean War without congressional approval.
  • C. Wilson v. New (1917)
    Wilson v. New (1917) was a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld federal authority to regulate railroad workers’ hours and wages, affirming the constitutionality of progressive labor legislation.
  • D. United States v. Darby
    United States v. Darby is a 1941 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld federal labor regulations under the Commerce Clause and marked a broad expansion of federal power over economic activity.
  • E. Crowell v. Benson
    Crowell v. Benson is a 1932 U.S. Supreme Court decision that helped define the constitutional limits of administrative agencies’ fact-finding powers and the scope of judicial review over administrative adjudications.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d88387363c8190a97a0c942130de97 completed April 10, 2026, 4:58 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e3599cbc448190bc80eef4ad58eb41 completed April 18, 2026, 10:14 a.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_6a006ef4f17c819095b3c6f8644b687b completed May 10, 2026, 11:41 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:16 a.m.