Triple
T16579225
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United States |
E402794
|
entity |
| Predicate | legalDoctrineExtended |
P4756
|
FINISHED |
| Object | exclusionary rule |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: exclusionary rule | Statement: [Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United States, legalDoctrineExtended, exclusionary rule]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: legalDoctrineExtended Context triple: [Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United States, legalDoctrineExtended, exclusionary rule]
-
A.
legalDoctrine
chosen
Indicates that one legal principle, rule, or theory is being applied, referenced, or relied upon as an authoritative basis for interpreting or deciding a legal issue.
-
B.
legalDoctrineInfluenced
Indicates that one legal doctrine has shaped, informed, or contributed to the development or interpretation of another legal doctrine.
-
C.
legalCodeFocus
Indicates that something is specifically concerned with, centered on, or primarily addressing a particular legal code or body of law.
-
D.
legalDoctrineChallenged
Indicates that a particular legal doctrine is being disputed, questioned, or contested, typically through litigation or formal legal argument.
-
E.
involvedInLegalDoctrine
Indicates that an entity plays a role in the formation, interpretation, application, or development of a particular legal doctrine.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d88387363c8190a97a0c942130de97 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 4:58 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e3595f9be88190b01ba628ecf1103d |
completed | April 18, 2026, 10:13 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e296a7d9d0819088555bca6c936e79 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 8:23 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:16 a.m.