Triple
T16579131
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Osing language |
E402791
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasGlottologName |
P6521
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Osing |
E1220841
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Osing | Statement: [Osing language, hasGlottologName, Osing]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Osing Context triple: [Osing language, hasGlottologName, Osing]
-
A.
Osing
chosen
Osing is an Austronesian language spoken primarily by the Osing people in the eastern part of Java, Indonesia.
-
B.
Upangas
Upangas are a group of secondary Jain scriptures that elaborate and supplement the teachings found in the primary Agamas.
-
C.
Narungga
Narungga are an Aboriginal Australian people and language group traditionally associated with the Yorke Peninsula in South Australia.
-
D.
Ayawa
Ayawa is an alternative name for the Yao people, an ethnic group found primarily in parts of East and Southern Africa.
-
E.
Kambe
Kambe is one of the Mijikenda sub-groups of the coastal Bantu peoples of Kenya, known for their distinct language and cultural traditions.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d88387363c8190a97a0c942130de97 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 4:58 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e3595f9be88190b01ba628ecf1103d |
completed | April 18, 2026, 10:13 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_6a007595cfd08190bae54d29427a1d3c |
completed | May 10, 2026, 12:09 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:16 a.m.