Triple

T16565670
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Douglas Hamilton, 8th Duke of Hamilton E402452 entity
Predicate hasNoSurvivingLegitimateIssue P124078 FINISHED
Object true LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Douglas Hamilton, 8th Duke of Hamilton, hasNoSurvivingLegitimateIssue, true]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasNoSurvivingLegitimateIssue
Context triple: [Douglas Hamilton, 8th Duke of Hamilton, hasNoSurvivingLegitimateIssue, true]
  • A. hasNoIssue
    Indicates that there are no problems, defects, or conflicts associated with the referenced entity or situation.
  • B. noLegitimateIssue
    Indicates that there is no valid, substantive, or legally recognized issue or dispute present in the given context.
  • C. hasIssueWith
    Indicates that one entity experiences a problem, conflict, or concern related to another entity.
  • D. hasNotableIssue
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a significant problem, concern, or defect that is noteworthy or exceptional compared to typical cases.
  • E. hasLegalIssue
    Indicates that an entity is involved in, associated with, or subject to a legal problem, dispute, or proceeding.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8838648088190acf97ef11fc3f61b completed April 10, 2026, 4:58 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e357711ea481909468147375051bb4 completed April 18, 2026, 10:05 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e296a47b7481909d9958158510c806 completed April 17, 2026, 8:23 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69e2d7f97e548190a474691a152bd8e8 completed April 18, 2026, 1:01 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:15 a.m.