Triple
T1655880
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Tommy Lasorda |
E35797
|
entity |
| Predicate | managedTo |
P30953
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 1996 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 1996 | Statement: [Tommy Lasorda, managedTo, 1996]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: managedTo Context triple: [Tommy Lasorda, managedTo, 1996]
-
A.
managedAct
Indicates that one entity oversaw, directed, or was responsible for carrying out a particular action or activity.
-
B.
managedAs
Indicates that one entity is administered, controlled, or handled in the same way or under the same policies, procedures, or classification as another entity.
-
C.
managedTeamTo
Indicates that one entity had managerial responsibility or oversight over the specified team.
-
D.
coManagedWith
Indicates that two or more entities share joint responsibility or authority in managing the same resource, project, or process.
-
E.
managedTeam
Indicates that one entity had responsibility for directing, supervising, and coordinating the work of another group or team.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a88606aa808190aa0b421b4271f220 |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69aaf3359ce48190803b322db8ad6027 |
completed | March 6, 2026, 3:31 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a907cff53c8190b424f088478d3e2c |
completed | March 5, 2026, 4:34 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69a99a4c3810819089d2dd0e23c8e46b |
completed | March 5, 2026, 2:59 p.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:29 p.m.