Triple
T16558330
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Gmina Świątniki Górne |
E402267
|
entity |
| Predicate | seat |
P75
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Świątniki Górne |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Świątniki Górne | Statement: [Gmina Świątniki Górne, seat, Świątniki Górne]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Świątniki Górne Context triple: [Gmina Świątniki Górne, seat, Świątniki Górne]
-
A.
Świątniki Górne
chosen
Świątniki Górne is a small town in southern Poland, situated near Kraków and known for its traditional locksmithing and metalworking industries.
-
B.
Tarnowskie Góry
Tarnowskie Góry is a historic town in southern Poland renowned for its UNESCO-listed silver, lead, and zinc mining heritage.
-
C.
Łaziska Górne
Łaziska Górne is a town in southern Poland’s Silesian Voivodeship, known for its heavy industry and role within the Upper Silesian urban area.
-
D.
Posada Górna
Posada Górna is a village in southeastern Poland located within the administrative district of Gmina Rymanów in the Subcarpathian region.
-
E.
Górzyca
Górzyca is a village in western Poland that serves as the seat of its rural administrative district in Słubice County, Lubusz Voivodeship.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8838648088190acf97ef11fc3f61b |
completed | April 10, 2026, 4:58 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e3576bce0c819087ab36f7dec5c394 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 10:05 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:15 a.m.