Triple
T16555844
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Build |
E402197
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasSociallyConsciousStyle |
P75906
|
FINISHED |
| Object | true |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Build, hasSociallyConsciousStyle, true]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasSociallyConsciousStyle Context triple: [Build, hasSociallyConsciousStyle, true]
-
A.
personHasNotableStyle
Indicates that a person is recognized for having a distinctive or noteworthy style.
-
B.
styleDiversity
Indicates variation in the manner, form, or approach with which an entity presents, performs, or expresses something across different instances or contexts.
-
C.
inTheStyleOf
Indicates that one entity is created, performed, or presented in a manner that imitates or closely resembles the characteristic style of another entity.
-
D.
hasEthicalPosition
chosen
Indicates that an entity holds or is associated with a particular ethical stance, viewpoint, or normative position on moral issues.
-
E.
styleTendsTo
Indicates that one style is generally inclined or likely to develop, appear, or be adopted in the direction of another style.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8838648088190acf97ef11fc3f61b |
completed | April 10, 2026, 4:58 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e34fc99f648190b40869ce52d351c8 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 9:32 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e296a47b7481909d9958158510c806 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 8:23 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:15 a.m.