Triple

T16551476
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Hydractinia echinata E402080 entity
Predicate usedAsModelOrganismFor P32525 FINISHED
Object regeneration LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: regeneration | Statement: [Hydractinia echinata, usedAsModelOrganismFor, regeneration]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: usedAsModelOrganismFor
Context triple: [Hydractinia echinata, usedAsModelOrganismFor, regeneration]
  • A. notableModelOrganism
    Indicates that an organism is widely recognized and frequently used as a standard or reference model for scientific research or experimentation.
  • B. isModelOrganism chosen
    Indicates that one organism is used as a representative experimental system for studying biological processes relevant to other organisms.
  • C. studiedOrganism
    Indicates that an entity conducted study or research on a particular organism.
  • D. containsModelOrganisms
    Indicates that one entity includes or incorporates model organisms as part of its contents or composition.
  • E. targetOrganism
    Indicates that an action, process, or effect is directed toward or intended to impact a particular organism.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d88384bc30819084229e7dcdc39a41 completed April 10, 2026, 4:58 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e34fc56f9081908bb8f6433a1a688d completed April 18, 2026, 9:32 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e2969fab208190ad64164d24748c45 completed April 17, 2026, 8:22 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:15 a.m.