Triple

T16536185
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Worthington, Ohio E401695 entity
Predicate hasHistoricPlanningPattern P58411 FINISHED
Object New England–style town plan LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: New England–style town plan | Statement: [Worthington, Ohio, hasHistoricPlanningPattern, New England–style town plan]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasHistoricPlanningPattern
Context triple: [Worthington, Ohio, hasHistoricPlanningPattern, New England–style town plan]
  • A. hasPlanningPattern chosen
    Indicates that an entity follows or is associated with a particular planning pattern or structured approach to planning.
  • B. hasHistoricalMigrationPattern
    Indicates that an entity exhibits a characteristic pattern of movement or relocation over time, typically observed across historical periods or generations.
  • C. hasHistoricProperty
    Indicates that one entity possesses, contains, or is associated with a property that has historical significance or heritage value.
  • D. hasHistoricalProcess
    Indicates that an entity is associated with, or characterized by, a historical process or sequence of events that unfolded over time.
  • E. hasHistoricMP
    Indicates that an entity is or has been represented by a specific Member of Parliament at some point in the past.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d88384bc30819084229e7dcdc39a41 completed April 10, 2026, 4:58 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e34558ec448190a6dcc15d62d1889c completed April 18, 2026, 8:48 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e2969fab208190ad64164d24748c45 completed April 17, 2026, 8:22 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:15 a.m.