Triple

T1651173
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Claude R. Wickard E35694 entity
Predicate legalCaseOutcomeAssociatedWith P30903 FINISHED
Object broad interpretation of the Commerce Clause LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: broad interpretation of the Commerce Clause | Statement: [Claude R. Wickard, legalCaseOutcomeAssociatedWith, broad interpretation of the Commerce Clause]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: legalCaseOutcomeAssociatedWith
Context triple: [Claude R. Wickard, legalCaseOutcomeAssociatedWith, broad interpretation of the Commerce Clause]
  • A. legalOutcome
    Indicates the resulting legal status, decision, or consequence that follows from a legal process, action, or judgment.
  • B. associatedCourtCase
    Indicates a relationship where one entity is linked to, or involved in, a particular court case.
  • C. associatedWithCourt
    Indicates a relationship in which an entity is linked or connected to a specific court, such as through jurisdiction, affiliation, or involvement in legal proceedings.
  • D. legalCase
    Indicates a relationship where a formal legal dispute or proceeding exists between parties, typically adjudicated by a court or similar authority.
  • E. relatedCase
    Indicates that one legal case is connected or associated with another case, such as through shared facts, parties, issues, or procedural history.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a8860568888190a32cd9f70acbba42 completed March 4, 2026, 7:20 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69aaa0fbe984819084f8daee81ca9b67 completed March 6, 2026, 9:40 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a907ce4dd881909168a1e99505d4ec completed March 5, 2026, 4:34 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69a949509d508190a3a35554996823de completed March 5, 2026, 9:13 a.m.
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:29 p.m.