Triple
T16493049
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Experimental test of parity conservation in beta decay |
E400611
|
entity |
| Predicate | showedNotViolatedIn |
P123752
|
FINISHED |
| Object | electromagnetic interaction |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: electromagnetic interaction | Statement: [Experimental test of parity conservation in beta decay, showedNotViolatedIn, electromagnetic interaction]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: showedNotViolatedIn Context triple: [Experimental test of parity conservation in beta decay, showedNotViolatedIn, electromagnetic interaction]
-
A.
notEnforcedBy
Indicates that a rule, policy, or obligation is not upheld, imposed, or carried out by the referenced enforcing entity.
-
B.
assertedViolationOf
Indicates that one party has formally claimed or alleged that a rule, law, standard, or obligation has been violated.
-
C.
violationOf
Indicates that one entity breaches, disobeys, or infringes upon a rule, law, agreement, or right associated with another entity.
-
D.
wasShownInconsistentBy
Indicates that one entity demonstrated or revealed inconsistency in the behavior, statements, or properties of another entity.
-
E.
allegedViolationSystem
Indicates a system is reported or suspected to have violated a rule, policy, or regulation, without the violation being legally or formally established.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d883813098819084f5409539723b59 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 4:58 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e32e30cb648190a52cb32896c4ac5a |
completed | April 18, 2026, 7:09 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e296902d6c8190884ddb612b8c5b36 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 8:22 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69e2d7f97e548190a474691a152bd8e8 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 1:01 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:13 a.m.