Triple

T16492805
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Electron E400606 entity
Predicate hasElectricDipoleMoment P123739 FINISHED
Object Consistent with zero within experimental limits LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Consistent with zero within experimental limits | Statement: [Electron, hasElectricDipoleMoment, Consistent with zero within experimental limits]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasElectricDipoleMoment
Context triple: [Electron, hasElectricDipoleMoment, Consistent with zero within experimental limits]
  • A. hasQuadrupoleMoment
    Indicates that an entity possesses a quadrupole moment, meaning its charge or mass distribution has a second-order spatial asymmetry beyond a simple dipole.
  • B. hasElectricCharge
    Indicates that an entity possesses a nonzero electric charge as a physical property.
  • C. hasMagneticMoment
    Indicates that an entity possesses a magnetic moment, characterizing the strength and orientation of its magnetism.
  • D. isElectricallyNeutral
    Indicates that an entity has no net electric charge, with its positive and negative charges balanced.
  • E. hasChargeConjugation
    Indicates that one entity is the charge-conjugated counterpart (particle vs. antiparticle form) of another entity.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d883813098819084f5409539723b59 completed April 10, 2026, 4:58 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e32e30cb648190a52cb32896c4ac5a completed April 18, 2026, 7:09 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e296902d6c8190884ddb612b8c5b36 completed April 17, 2026, 8:22 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69e2d7f97e548190a474691a152bd8e8 completed April 18, 2026, 1:01 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:13 a.m.