Triple

T1649155
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject SNMPv2c E35651 entity
Predicate usesSecurityModel P16014 FINISHED
Object community-based security LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: community-based security | Statement: [SNMPv2c, usesSecurityModel, community-based security]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: usesSecurityModel
Context triple: [SNMPv2c, usesSecurityModel, community-based security]
  • A. hasSecurityPresence
    Indicates that some form of security personnel, system, or measures are present at or associated with an entity or location.
  • B. hasSecurityRelationship
    Indicates a relationship in which one entity provides, manages, or is otherwise linked to the security or protection of another entity.
  • C. hasSecurityNotion chosen
    Indicates that one entity possesses, defines, or is associated with a particular concept or notion of security in relation to another entity or context.
  • D. hasSecurityArea
    Indicates that an entity is associated with, assigned to, or falls within a defined security-controlled area or zone.
  • E. hasSecuritySupport
    Indicates that one entity provides security-related assistance, maintenance, or protection services for another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a8860568888190a32cd9f70acbba42 completed March 4, 2026, 7:20 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69aaa0fbe984819084f8daee81ca9b67 completed March 6, 2026, 9:40 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a907ce4dd881909168a1e99505d4ec completed March 5, 2026, 4:34 a.m.
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:29 p.m.