Triple

T16483465
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Deutz, Cologne E400378 entity
Predicate hasRiverBankUse P85477 FINISHED
Object recreational promenade LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: recreational promenade | Statement: [Deutz, Cologne, hasRiverBankUse, recreational promenade]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasRiverBankUse
Context triple: [Deutz, Cologne, hasRiverBankUse, recreational promenade]
  • A. hasRiverUse
    Indicates that one entity makes use of a river associated with another entity, such as for transport, irrigation, recreation, or other purposes.
  • B. hasWaterfrontUse
    Indicates that an entity is used, designated, or suitable for activities or purposes directly related to a waterfront or shoreline area.
  • C. hasParkAlongBank
    Indicates that a park is located adjacent to or running alongside the bank of a water body.
  • D. hasRiverBankSettlement
    Indicates that a settlement is located on or directly adjacent to the bank of a river.
  • E. hasRiverbanksUse chosen
    Indicates how the riverbanks of a river or watercourse are used or managed (e.g., for agriculture, recreation, conservation, or infrastructure).
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d883813098819084f5409539723b59 completed April 10, 2026, 4:58 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e32e0420ac81908f9a3548ddb3b1ff completed April 18, 2026, 7:08 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e22706b0588190a48a951c5211a617 completed April 17, 2026, 12:26 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:13 a.m.