Triple
T16476630
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Bondurant, Iowa |
E400203
|
entity |
| Predicate | region |
P40
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Polk County |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Polk County | Statement: [Bondurant, Iowa, region, Polk County]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Polk County Context triple: [Bondurant, Iowa, region, Polk County]
-
A.
Polk County
Polk County is a county in northwestern Georgia known for its location within the historic Georgia Gold Belt and its role in the region’s mining and agricultural history.
-
B.
Polk County
Polk County is a county in northwestern Oregon, United States, located in the Willamette Valley region across the Willamette River from Salem.
-
C.
Polk County
chosen
Polk County is a county in the U.S. state of Iowa that includes the city of Des Moines and serves as a major governmental and economic hub for the region.
-
D.
Polk County
Polk County is a county in northwestern Wisconsin known for its rural communities, lakes, and outdoor recreational opportunities.
-
E.
Polk County
Polk County is a rural county in eastern Nebraska known for its agricultural landscape and small communities.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d883813098819084f5409539723b59 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 4:58 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e32dd4f53081908f78b88435c8c719 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 7:08 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:13 a.m.