Triple

T16464151
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Shriever E399884 entity
Predicate phoneticRelation P9333 FINISHED
Object pronounced similarly to "Shriver" LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: pronounced similarly to "Shriver" | Statement: [Shriever, phoneticRelation, pronounced similarly to "Shriver"]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: phoneticRelation
Context triple: [Shriever, phoneticRelation, pronounced similarly to "Shriver"]
  • A. phonologyRelation
    Indicates a relationship between linguistic elements based on their phonological properties, such as sound patterns, features, or structures.
  • B. phoneticComponents
    Indicates that one entity serves as a phonetic component or contributes to the pronunciation of another entity.
  • C. isPhonetic chosen
    Indicates that one entity represents the phonetic (sound-based) form or pronunciation of another entity.
  • D. phoneticValue
    Indicates a relationship where a symbol, sign, or written element is associated with the specific sound or sequence of sounds it represents.
  • E. hasPhonologicalBasisFor
    Indicates that one entity serves as the phonological source, motivation, or foundation for another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d87f2dac988190b74d6e185fa88ba4 completed April 10, 2026, 4:40 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e32d83687081908450657e1da6f6af completed April 18, 2026, 7:06 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e227048d608190a4205eae3117629a completed April 17, 2026, 12:26 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:10 a.m.