Triple

T16462036
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject I-70 Series E399828 entity
Predicate Game6Controversy P51734 FINISHED
Object missed call at first base in the 9th inning LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: missed call at first base in the 9th inning | Statement: [I-70 Series, Game6Controversy, missed call at first base in the 9th inning]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: Game6Controversy
Context triple: [I-70 Series, Game6Controversy, missed call at first base in the 9th inning]
  • A. game6ControversyPlayPitcher
    Indicates that a specific play in game 6 was controversial and involved a particular pitcher.
  • B. game6ControversyPlayBatter
    Indicates that a specific controversial play in game 6 involved a particular batter as the offensive participant.
  • C. game6NotableEvent chosen
    Indicates that a notable event occurred during game 6 of a series or competition involving the related entities.
  • D. controversialBecause
    Indicates that one entity is considered controversial specifically due to, or as a result of, its relationship with or association to another entity.
  • E. controversyType
    Indicates the specific kind or category of controversy associated with an entity or situation.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d87f2dac988190b74d6e185fa88ba4 completed April 10, 2026, 4:40 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e32d819d548190bc76a0ec2e223437 completed April 18, 2026, 7:06 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e227048d608190a4205eae3117629a completed April 17, 2026, 12:26 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:10 a.m.