Triple
T16452337
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Gordian dynasty |
E399582
|
entity |
| Predicate | currency |
P245
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Roman antoninianus |
E781058
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Roman antoninianus | Statement: [Gordian dynasty, currency, Roman antoninianus]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Roman antoninianus Context triple: [Gordian dynasty, currency, Roman antoninianus]
-
A.
Roman sestertius
The Roman sestertius was a large bronze coin of the Roman Empire, widely used in everyday transactions and notable for its detailed imperial portraits and propaganda imagery.
-
B.
antoninianus
chosen
The antoninianus was a Roman silver coin, later heavily debased, widely used during the 3rd century AD.
-
C.
Aqua Antoniniana
Aqua Antoniniana was an ancient Roman aqueduct built to supply water to the Baths of Caracalla in Rome.
-
D.
Follis
The follis was a large bronze coin used in the Byzantine Empire, particularly prominent in the 6th and 7th centuries.
-
E.
Roman mint
The Roman mint was the official facility in ancient Rome where the state produced its coinage, playing a central role in the empire’s economy and monetary policy.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d87f2c6778819080fcfae53be8f12a |
completed | April 10, 2026, 4:40 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e32ce19344819083d323077b742bc3 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 7:04 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_6a004598ec088190be80ad70e3f1357e |
completed | May 10, 2026, 8:45 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:10 a.m.