Triple

T16451717
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Robinson v. Memphis & Charleston Railroad Company E399566 entity
Predicate relatedCase P3137 FINISHED
Object United States v. Stanley E399562 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: United States v. Stanley | Statement: [Robinson v. Memphis & Charleston Railroad Company, relatedCase, United States v. Stanley]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: United States v. Stanley
Context triple: [Robinson v. Memphis & Charleston Railroad Company, relatedCase, United States v. Stanley]
  • A. United States v. Stanley chosen
    United States v. Stanley is a U.S. Supreme Court decision that formed part of the Civil Rights Cases, in which the Court limited federal power to prohibit racial discrimination by private individuals and businesses.
  • B. United States v. Comstock
    United States v. Comstock is a 2010 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld Congress’s authority to civilly commit mentally ill, sexually dangerous federal prisoners beyond their release date under the Constitution’s Necessary and Proper Clause.
  • C. United States v. Henry
    United States v. Henry is a U.S. Supreme Court decision that further defined the Sixth Amendment right to counsel by limiting the government’s use of jailhouse informants to deliberately elicit incriminating statements from indicted defendants.
  • D. United States v. Classic
    United States v. Classic is a 1941 U.S. Supreme Court decision that expanded federal authority over primary elections by holding that Congress can regulate primaries when they are an integral part of the electoral process for federal offices.
  • E. United States v. Basye
    United States v. Basye is a U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified the tax treatment of income assigned to others, particularly in the context of professional partnerships and deferred compensation arrangements.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d87f2c6778819080fcfae53be8f12a completed April 10, 2026, 4:40 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e32ce19344819083d323077b742bc3 completed April 18, 2026, 7:04 a.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_6a005815efc48190868305f428cb9085 completed May 10, 2026, 10:04 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:10 a.m.