Triple
T16451655
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | United States v. Nichols |
E399564
|
entity |
| Predicate | thirteenthAmendmentDoctrine |
P17468
|
FINISHED |
| Object | limited reading of badges and incidents of slavery |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: limited reading of badges and incidents of slavery | Statement: [United States v. Nichols, thirteenthAmendmentDoctrine, limited reading of badges and incidents of slavery]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: thirteenthAmendmentDoctrine Context triple: [United States v. Nichols, thirteenthAmendmentDoctrine, limited reading of badges and incidents of slavery]
-
A.
finalAbolition
Indicates the complete and permanent elimination of something, such that it no longer exists or is practiced in any form.
-
B.
hasConstitutionalDoctrine
chosen
Indicates that an entity is associated with, based on, or governed by a particular constitutional doctrine or set of constitutional principles.
-
C.
positionOn15thAmendment
Indicates a stance or viewpoint that an entity holds regarding the Fifteenth Amendment.
-
D.
constitutionalAmendmentInvolved
Indicates that a specific constitutional amendment is directly relevant to, affects, or is implicated in the described situation, case, or action.
-
E.
tenthAmendmentClaim
Indicates that a party asserts a legal claim based on the Tenth Amendment, alleging that a government action exceeds federal authority and infringes powers reserved to the states or the people.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d87f2c6778819080fcfae53be8f12a |
completed | April 10, 2026, 4:40 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e32ce06de0819086eea241c6b32223 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 7:04 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e227048d608190a4205eae3117629a |
completed | April 17, 2026, 12:26 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:10 a.m.