Triple
T16451654
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | United States v. Nichols |
E399564
|
entity |
| Predicate | stateActionDoctrine |
P4473
|
FINISHED |
| Object | reinforced requirement of state action for Fourteenth Amendment violations |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: reinforced requirement of state action for Fourteenth Amendment violations | Statement: [United States v. Nichols, stateActionDoctrine, reinforced requirement of state action for Fourteenth Amendment violations]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: stateActionDoctrine Context triple: [United States v. Nichols, stateActionDoctrine, reinforced requirement of state action for Fourteenth Amendment violations]
-
A.
createdDoctrine
Indicates that an entity originated, formulated, or established a particular doctrine, theory, or set of principles.
-
B.
sharesDoctrine
Indicates that two entities adhere to or promote the same doctrine, belief system, or set of principles.
-
C.
statusInDoctrine
Indicates the recognized standing or role that something holds within a particular doctrinal or theological system.
-
D.
usesDoctrine
chosen
Indicates that one entity applies, follows, or relies on a particular doctrine in its actions or reasoning.
-
E.
definedDoctrineAt
Indicates that a particular doctrine was formally established, articulated, or codified at a specific place or time.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d87f2c6778819080fcfae53be8f12a |
completed | April 10, 2026, 4:40 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e32ce06de0819086eea241c6b32223 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 7:04 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e227048d608190a4205eae3117629a |
completed | April 17, 2026, 12:26 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:10 a.m.