Triple
T16445555
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Fraenkel–Mostowski permutation models |
E399414
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | model of set theory with atoms |
C37463
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: model of set theory with atoms Context triple: [Fraenkel–Mostowski permutation models, instanceOf, model of set theory with atoms]
-
A.
axiomatic set theory
Axiomatic set theory is a branch of mathematical logic that studies sets and their relationships by formulating precise axioms to avoid paradoxes and provide a rigorous foundation for mathematics.
-
B.
antimony in naive set theory
Antinomy in naive set theory is a self-contradictory situation arising from unrestricted set formation, where seemingly valid principles lead to paradoxical sets such as the set of all sets that do not contain themselves.
-
C.
set-theoretic concept
A set-theoretic concept is an abstract mathematical idea defined in terms of sets and their elements, relationships, and operations, such as membership, union, intersection, and power sets.
-
D.
result in model theory
In model theory, a result is a formally proven statement—such as a theorem, lemma, or corollary—about structures, theories, or definable sets that follows from the axioms and logical rules of the framework.
-
E.
non-classical theory of truth
A non-classical theory of truth is an account of truth that revises or rejects classical logical principles (such as bivalence or excluded middle) to handle phenomena like vagueness, paradoxes, or semantic indeterminacy.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d87f2c6778819080fcfae53be8f12a |
completed | April 10, 2026, 4:40 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:10 a.m.