Triple
T16445553
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Fraenkel–Mostowski permutation models |
E399414
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | set-theoretic construction |
C33769
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: set-theoretic construction Context triple: [Fraenkel–Mostowski permutation models, instanceOf, set-theoretic construction]
-
A.
set-theoretic concept
chosen
A set-theoretic concept is an abstract mathematical idea defined in terms of sets and their elements, relationships, and operations, such as membership, union, intersection, and power sets.
-
B.
axiomatic set theory
Axiomatic set theory is a branch of mathematical logic that studies sets and their relationships by formulating precise axioms to avoid paradoxes and provide a rigorous foundation for mathematics.
-
C.
measure-theoretic construction
A measure-theoretic construction is a rigorous method of building mathematical objects—such as measures, integrals, or probability spaces—by specifying σ-algebras, set functions, and limiting processes that satisfy the axioms of measure theory.
-
D.
construction in proof theory
A construction in proof theory is a systematically defined method or procedure used within formal proofs to build objects, derive new statements, or transform existing proofs while preserving logical validity.
-
E.
antimony in naive set theory
Antinomy in naive set theory is a self-contradictory situation arising from unrestricted set formation, where seemingly valid principles lead to paradoxical sets such as the set of all sets that do not contain themselves.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d87f2c6778819080fcfae53be8f12a |
completed | April 10, 2026, 4:40 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:10 a.m.